Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://t2-4.bsc.es/jspui/handle/123456789/56474
Title: | Finnish Identities, Values and Attitudes 2017-2018 Suomalaisten identiteetit, arvot ja asenteet 2017-2018 |
Keywords: | identiteetti alueellinen identiteetti arvot asenteet käsitykset yhteiskunnallinen asema mielipiteet suomalaisuus kansallinen identiteetti communities community identification identity national identity personal identity |
Publisher: | Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto Finnish Social Science Data Archive |
Description: | Aineisto käsittelee suomalaista identiteettiä eli sitä, millaisiksi suomalaiset näkevät itsensä, joko yksilöinä tai osana erilaisia ryhmiä. Aineistossa tarkastellaan yksilön lähipiirin, elinpiirin, erilaisten ryhmien ja yhteiskunnallisen orientaation ja arvojen merkitystä identiteetille. Tutkimuksen rahoittivat Suomen Kulttuurirahasto SKR ja e2 Tutkimus. Kyselyn alussa kartoitettiin sitä, mitkä tekijät vastaaja kokee tärkeänä oman identiteetin kannalta. Vastaajalta kysyttiin millaisiin alueellisiin ryhmiin hän kokee kuuluvansa. Seuraavaksi kartoitettiin lapsuuden ja nuoruuden kasvuolosuhteita. Tämän jälkeen kysyttiin vastaajan mielipiteitä erilaisten ihmisryhmien asemasta Suomessa. Seuraavaksi tarkasteltiin vastaajan arvoja erilaisten väittämien pohjalta ja kysyttiin, kuinka tärkeitä erilaiset arvot kuten menestys ja sosiaalinen oikeudenmukaisuus vastaajalle ovat. Lopuksi aineisto sisältää laajat avovastaukset kysymykseen, jossa kartoitetaan mitkä tekijät erityisesti yhdistävät ja mitkä erottavat suomalaisia. Taustamuuttujina ovat suurimmat kaupungit, maakunta, kuntakoko, suuralue, sukupuoli, ikä, asuinympäristö, asumisvuodet asuinpaikkakunnalla, yhteiskuntaluokka, työssäkäynti, lapsuuden maakunta, puoluekanta, kieli, uskonnollisuus, koulutus, työnantajasektori, ammatti, talouden elämäntilanne, kotona asuvien lasten iät, lasten määrä, talouden koko ja talouden bruttotulot. The survey studied the values and identities of Finnish people, concentrating on the self-image of the respondents as an individual and as part of different groups. Main themes included the significance of an individual's immediate circle and area of residence, belonging to different groups, social orientation, and values as constructors of personal identity. The study was funded by Finnish Cultural Foundation and E2 Research. First, the respondents were asked how significant they thought various regional and social factors, such as their current area of residence, being a Finnish or European citizen, level of education, and religiosity, were as contributors to their identity. The respondents' feelings of belonging to a specific regional, cultural or ethnic group (e.g. people living in South Ostrobothnia or Lapland, or Swedish-speaking Finns) were also surveyed. The respondents were asked to describe their area of residence (e.g. whether they lived in a large city centre, suburb, or rural town) and their family's social class (e.g. whether their family was a working or middle class family) during their childhood. Next, the respondents' views on the least and most disadvantaged groups in Finland were charted (e.g. whether they thought young people, entrepreneurs, students, asylum seekers, or people living in cities were too disadvantaged/advantaged compared to others). Several statements were presented to the respondents to examine their values and attitudes. The statements included, for example, whether the respondent thought that being Finnish was connected to one's ethnic background, that the media portrayed Finnish opinions inaccurately, and that Finland needs strong leadership so that social problems can be fixed without compromises. The respondents were also asked how they would describe themselves (e.g. as easily excited, disciplined, curious, modest). Finally, the importance of several things for the respondents, such as power, wealth, equality, and forgiveness, was charted. The respondents were also asked to consider what was extremely important for them in their life (e.g. health, love, children, traditions, safety and security). Background variables included, among others, the respondent's NUTS2 and NUTS3 regions of residence, number of inhabitants in R's municipality of residence, gender, age group, degree of urbanisation of R's municipality of residence, subjective social class, field and level of education, economic activity and occupational status, household composition, and household income. |
Other Identifiers: | FSD3447 10.60686/t-fsd3447 urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3447 https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3447 |
Appears in Collections: | Cessda |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.