1. By-Covid
  2. All content
  3. Cessda
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://t2-4.bsc.es/jspui/handle/123456789/56560
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorTerveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos (THL). Tasa-arvotiedon keskusfi
dc.creatorTilastokeskusfi
dc.creatorNational Institute for Health and Welfare. Centre for Gender Equality Informationen
dc.creatorStatistics Finlanden
dc.date2019-05-14fi
dc.date2019-05-14en
dc.identifierFSD3345-
dc.identifier10.60686/t-fsd3345-
dc.identifierurn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3345-
dc.identifierhttps://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3345-
dc.descriptionTasa-arvobarometri 2017 mittaa sukupuolten tasa-arvoon liittyviä asenteita, mielipiteitä ja kokemuksia elämän eri osa-alueilla sekä niiden kehittymistä Suomessa. Tasa-arvobarometreja on kerätty aiemmin vuosina 1998, 2001, 2004, 2008 ja 2012, mutta niitä ei ole tallennettu Tietoarkistoon. Barometrin aihealueina ovat koululaisten ja opiskelijoiden kokemukset tasa-arvon toteutumisesta oppilaitoksissa, palkansaajien ja yrittäjien kokemukset tasa-arvon toteutumisesta työpaikoilla, työelämän ulkopuolella olevien kokemukset tasa-arvon toteutumisesta työnhaussa, palkansaajien arviot työn ja perheen yhteensovittamisesta sekä työpaikkojen suhtautumisesta perhevapaiden pitämiseen, sukupuolten tasa-arvon toteutuminen perheiden sisäisessä työnjaossa ja päätöksenteossa sekä seksuaalisen häirinnän ja sukupuoleen liittyvän vihapuheen kohtaaminen. Aiheita käsiteltiin useilla erilaisilla kysymyksillä ja väittämillä. Taustamuuttujina ovat ikäryhmä, sukupuoli, asuinmaakunta, kotitalouden rakenne, koulutus, työelämään osallistuminen, ammattiasema, esimiesasema ja tulot.fi
dc.descriptionThe survey focused on attitudes, opinions and experiences related to gender equality in different spheres of life in Finland. The main focus was on equality in working life, education and family life. Questions investigated opinions on the general status of men and women in Finland, estimates for gender equality development in the following 10 years, whether the respondents thought there should be more men or women in certain positions or occupational fields (e.g. in positions of power, in social and health services, ICT), and whether women's possibilities were equal to men's in occupational life. Attitudes were charted on gender roles in the family in terms of money matters and domestic responsibilities, gender roles in politics and in decision-making in different spheres of politics, and ways to reduce unjustified wage differences. Full-time students were asked about their gender-related experiences in study, for example, whether there was gender stereotyping in study materials or in the educational institution, whether a clear majority of students in their field consisted of men or women, did gender affect student treatment or grades, strictness of gender roles/norms in the institution, support for choosing a study field where the respondent's gender was a minority, and whether sexual minorities and rainbow families were taken into account in teaching or teaching material. Other questions investigated occurrences of sexual harassment and hate speech, kinds of harassment, the perpetrators and the context. The respondents were also asked whether there were people who depreciated or belittled their speech or suggestions on account of their gender and who. A number of questions investigated whether gender affected the wage level, fringe benefits, work loads, career advancement, job contracts, autonomy at work etc. in the workplace and whether gender was a hindrance in entrepreneurship and in what kind of situations. Further topics included attitudes in the workplace relating to absences of men and women due to family matters or paternal leaves, division of caring and other household tasks in R's family and who paid what in the household. Background variables included the respondent's age group, gender, region of residence (NUTS3), highest education attained, status in employment, economic activity, occupational status, number of employees R supervised, type of employment contract, average weekly working hours, whether R belonged to a minority group, type of minority group, living arrangements, marital status, gender of the spouse, spouse's economic activity, number and ages of children aged under 18 in the household, how often R met his or her children who lived elsewhere. For students, type of educational institution.en
dc.languageen-
dc.languagefi-
dc.publisherYhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkistofi
dc.publisherFinnish Social Science Data Archiveen
dc.rightsTietoarkiston ja aineiston luovuttajan tekemän sopimuksen mukaisesti.fi
dc.rightsIn accordance with the agreement between FSD and the depositor.en
dc.subjectasenteetfi
dc.subjecttasa-arvofi
dc.subjectsukupuolifi
dc.subjecttyöelämäfi
dc.subjectoppilaitoksetfi
dc.subjectperheetfi
dc.subjectparisuhdefi
dc.subjectyhteiskunnallinen asemafi
dc.subjecttasa-arvosuunnitelmatfi
dc.subjectsukupuolinen häirintäfi
dc.subjectkotityöfi
dc.subjectvihapuhefi
dc.subjectvähemmistötfi
dc.subjectattitudesen
dc.subjectdomestic responsibilitiesen
dc.subjecteducationen
dc.subjectequality between the sexesen
dc.subjectfamily rolesen
dc.subjectgender roleen
dc.subjecthousehold budgetsen
dc.subjectoccupational lifeen
dc.subjectparental leaveen
dc.subjectpaternity leaveen
dc.subjectsexual harassmenten
dc.subjectsex discriminationen
dc.subjectwomen's roleen
dc.subjectwork-life balanceen
dc.titleGender Equality Barometer 2017en
dc.titleTasa-arvobarometri 2017fi
dc.typeDataseten
dc.coverageSuomifi
dc.coverageFinlanden
Appears in Collections:Cessda

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.