1. By-Covid
  2. All content
  3. Cessda
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://t2-4.bsc.es/jspui/handle/123456789/56709
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorTaloustutkimusfi
dc.creatorUlkoasiainministeriöfi
dc.creatorTaloustutkimusen
dc.creatorMinistry for Foreign Affairs of Finlanden
dc.date2017-10-26fi
dc.date2017-12-12en
dc.identifierFSD3187-
dc.identifierurn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3187-
dc.identifierhttp://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3187-
dc.identifier.urihttps://t2-4.bsc.es/jspui/handle/123456789/56709*
dc.descriptionTutkimuksessa selvitettiin suomalaisten mielipiteitä kehitysyhteistyöstä. Tutkimuksen on toteuttanut Taloustutkimus Oy Ulkoasiainministeriön toimeksiannosta. Kysely on jatkoa vuodesta 2002 toteutetuille tutkimuksille. Kysymykset käsittelivät laajasti kehitysyhteistyötä ja kehityspolitiikkaa. Niillä kartoitettiin mm. kehitysyhteistyön kohdentumista ja tuloksia, kehitysyhteistyön määrärahoja sekä kehitysyhteistyöstä saatavaa tietoa ja omaa osallistumista kehitysyhteistyöhön. Osa kysymyksistä on ollut mukana vuosien ajan samanmuotoisina, jolloin mielipiteiden muutosta voidaan seurata. Taustamuuttujina ovat sukupuoli, ikä, talouden tyyppi, internetin käyttö, työelämään osallistuminen, ammatti, koulutus, siviilisääty, perheen eniten ansaitsevan henkilön ammatti/asema ja koulutus, perheen tuloluokka, asunnon tyyppi sekä aluemuuttujia.fi
dc.descriptionThe survey charted Finnish opinions on and knowledge of the country's development cooperation, its importance, content, objectives, and allocation. Some questions focused on the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (Agenda 2030). The data were collected as part of Taloustutkimus's national CAPI Omnibus study. The respondents were asked what they thought development cooperation was, how important they regarded development cooperation to be, and to what extent they agreed with a number of statements relating to development cooperation (e.g. "Development cooperation increases Finland's international influence"). Familiarity with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (Agenda 2030) was surveyed as well as views on the most important Sustainable Development Goals. Opinions on funding the private sector of developing countries were studied. Furthermore, thoughts on the significance of development cooperation in alleviating poverty and improving the lives of people in developing countries were investigated. The respondents were asked to choose two of the most important areas for advancing the rights and circumstances of girls and women. Regarding inequality, the respondents were asked how Finland could decrease global inequality. Views were studied on whether development cooperation could prevent refugee crisis from happening by helping people in their own country, and if Finland's development cooperation could help with preventing climate change. With regard to development cooperation by Finland, opinions were studied on the importance of Finnish humanitarian aid, the most important forms of development cooperation for Finland (e.g. bilateral, multilateral, cooperation through the EU), and to what causes should humanitarian aid primarily be directed to. The respondents' factual knowledge was charted by asking how much the respondents thought Finland was going to spend on development cooperation in 2017 (as percentage of the GNI and in euros). The respondents were asked whether Finland should increase or decrease the amount of funding allocated to development cooperation in light of the current economic situation. Some questions pertained to whether there was enough information available on development cooperation and developing countries, from which information sources the respondents had received information on these topics, and how reliable public authorities, voluntary/civic organisations and the media were as sources of such information. The respondents were also asked how they thought they could help the developing countries as individuals and how they had participated in helping the developing countries or people in those countries in the past year. Background variables included, among others, the respondent's age, gender, economic activity and occupational status, education, and marital status as well as economic activity/occupational status and education of the household head, household composition, ages of children living at home, gross annual income of the household, municipality size and type, major region (NUTS2) and region (NUTS3) of residence, type of accommodation, type of mobile phone, and Internet and social media use.en
dc.languagefi-
dc.languageen-
dc.publisherYhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkistofi
dc.publisherFinnish Social Science Data Archiveen
dc.rightsTietoarkiston ja aineiston luovuttajan tekemän sopimuksen mukaisesti.fi
dc.rightsIn accordance with the agreement between FSD and the depositor.en
dc.subjectkehitysyhteistyöfi
dc.subjectkehityspolitiikkafi
dc.subjectmäärärahatfi
dc.subjecthyvinvointifi
dc.subjectkestävä kehitysfi
dc.subjectavustustoimintafi
dc.subjectkansainvälinen yhteistyöfi
dc.subjectkehitysmaatfi
dc.subjectköyhyysfi
dc.subjectpakolaisetfi
dc.subjectkatastrofiapufi
dc.subjectaiden
dc.subjectdeveloping countriesen
dc.subjectdevelopment aid (international)en
dc.subjectdevelopment policyen
dc.subjectinternational cooperationen
dc.subjectpovertyen
dc.subjectpublic expenditureen
dc.subjectrefugeesen
dc.subjectsustainabilityen
dc.titleKehitysyhteistyötutkimus 2017fi
dc.titleDevelopment Cooperation Survey 2017en
dc.typeDataseten
dc.coverageSuomifi
dc.coverageFinlanden
Appears in Collections:Cessda

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.