Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://t2-4.bsc.es/jspui/handle/123456789/59574Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Barton Hronesova, J, University of Oxford | en |
| dc.date | 2021-07-27T00:00:00Z | en |
| dc.identifier | 10.5255/UKDA-SN-855040 | - |
| dc.identifier | 855040 | - |
| dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-855040 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://t2-4.bsc.es/jspui/handle/123456789/59574 | * |
| dc.description | Memory politics worldwide is often shaped by the dynamics of relations and tensions between hegemonic narratives, counter-memories and silent communities at the global, national and local levels. Transnational advocacy movements, international agents and organisations influence the application of terminologies and frameworks in which global hegemonic narratives operate. State actors influence and shape hegemonic narratives, silence others or deny their existence in order to legitimise their incumbency and state/nation-building efforts. Local actors – from civil society groups to individuals – often counter top-down efforts of hegemonic narratives by the creation of their own narratives, memories or by silence. In post-conflict and conflict societies the relations between different groups and actors advocating hegemonic narratives becomes all the more acute and tense as the social and political fabric is eroded and in flux by the conflict-generated transformative changes. How do we understand hegemonic narratives in post-war societies? What do we know about them? How can we conceptualise hegemonic narratives in research inquiry? What constitutes such narratives in societies emerging from conflicts or in the midst of conflict? What is their role in relation to other mnemonic practices such as silencing, forgetting, neglecting, amnesia, or denial? And if they are, in what way do they differ? This symposium seeks to discuss these and other questions using a large number of case studies that can speak to some aspects of memory politics and hegemonic narratives. The key aims of the symposium are to: a) Discuss the dynamics of hegemonic narratives at local, national and global level with a special reference to post-conflict situations; b) Examine the various roles of actors, agents and institutions in shaping, organising, influencing, challenging and transforming memories and key narratives in (post-)conflict societies; c) Facilitate an interdisciplinarity discussion in memory and a cross-disciplinary debates about the roles of memory in post-war societies; d) Theorise and conceptualise different types, approaches to studies of memory, silence, forgetting and remembering; e) Discuss the various roles of victims, perpetrators and new conflict-engendered communities.<p>This postdoctoral research was tailored to produce a monograph about the differences between victim categories and their compensation in post-1995 Bosnia, linked to my doctoral project. As part of the project, I have also organised a conference/symposium on wider memory politics.</p> | en |
| dc.language | en | - |
| dc.rights | Jessie Barton Hronesova, University of Oxford | en |
| dc.subject | MEMORY | en |
| dc.subject | WAR | en |
| dc.subject | TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE | en |
| dc.subject | GENOCIDE | en |
| dc.subject | RWANDA | en |
| dc.subject | GERMANY | en |
| dc.subject | SERBIA | en |
| dc.subject | NORTHERN IRELAND TROUBLES | en |
| dc.subject | POLAND | en |
| dc.subject | ZIMBABWE | en |
| dc.subject | LEBANON | en |
| dc.subject | 2021 | en |
| dc.title | Hegemonic Narratives in Post-Conflict Societies, 2020 | en |
| dc.type | Dataset | en |
| dc.coverage | World Wide | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Cessda | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.