1. By-Covid
  2. All content
  3. Cessda
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://t2-4.bsc.es/jspui/handle/123456789/61838
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCioroianu, I., University of Exeter, Centre for Elections, Media and Participationen
dc.creatorBanducci, S., University of Exeteren
dc.creatorCoan, T., University of Exeter, Centre for Elections, Media and Participationen
dc.creatorStevens, D., University of Exeter, Centre for Elections, Media and Participationen
dc.date2018-12-05T12:56:52Zen
dc.identifier10.5255/UKDA-SN-8397-1-
dc.identifier8397-
dc.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-8397-1-
dc.identifier.urihttps://t2-4.bsc.es/jspui/handle/123456789/61838*
dc.description<P>Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.</P>en
dc.description<p>The <span style="font-style: italic;">Media Context and the 2017 General Election: How Traditional and Social Media Shape Elections&nbsp;</span>data consist of an analysis of media coverage of the 2017 British General Election. Media included are national newspapers, local newspapers, national and regional television news, and radio. The complete list of outlets is included in the codebooks. This study was conducted as part of the ESRC <span style="font-style: italic;">Media in Context and the 2017 General Election</span> award, which extends the analysis of the 2015 election, data available under SN 8176.<br><br>In 2017 the electoral context had shifted from two years earlier, with a majority Conservative government, different leaders of almost all the major parties, Brexit as both the main issue (prior to the terrorist bomb in Manchester) and the ostensible reason the election was called, the possibility of the incumbent government gaining the largest proportion of the vote in a generation, and a growing distrust of polling data and the media e.g., ‘fake news’ and Twitter bots. This provided us with the opportunity to re-examine media coverage and extend our aims in four ways,&nbsp;by: 1) Looking at media coverage and its effects on different leaders and different issues than in 2015, e.g., Theresa May, Jeremy Corbyn, and Brexit; 2) Comparing the drivers of coverage of the election in traditional and social media, how they interact, and their effects in an era of “fake news” and “post-truth democracy” ; 3) Drawing links between key narratives in the 2015 post-election media coverage that led to the EU referendum and key narratives on Brexit in the 2017 campaign; 4)Identifying the aspects of media and media effects that vary between a competitive and an uncompetitive election at the national level and those that stay constant. Data collection was for the following additional objectives: 1. To extend the longitudinal data set using the methods we established for the 2015 media content, capturing traditional and social media coverage of the 2017 election beginning on April 18th, 2017, the day Theresa May announced her intention to call an election and ending with the Queen’s speech on June 21st. 2. As in ES/M010775/1, to link traditional media content and social media analysis from 2017 to questions in the British Election Study, both allowing examination of media effects in 2017, and, for the same respondents, in 2015 for comparison.<br><br>Further information about this study can be found on the<a href="https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FR005087%2F1" target="_blank" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"> Gateway to Research webpages</a>.</p>en
dc.languageen-
dc.rightsCopyright D. Stevens, S.A. Banducci and T. Coan<br>en
dc.subjectSOCIAL MEDIAen
dc.subjectNEWSPAPER READERSHIPen
dc.subjectBRITISH POLITICAL PARTIESen
dc.subjectCENTRAL GOVERNMENTen
dc.subjectCONSERVATIVE PARTY (GREAT BRITAIN)en
dc.subjectELECTION CAMPAIGNSen
dc.subjectELECTIONSen
dc.subjectELECTORAL ISSUESen
dc.subjectGREEN PARTY (UNITED KINGDOM)en
dc.subjectLABOUR PARTY (GREAT BRITAIN)en
dc.subjectMASS MEDIAen
dc.subjectMASS MEDIA COVERAGEen
dc.subjectNEWSPAPERSen
dc.subjectNEWSPAPERSen
dc.subjectNORTHERN IRELAND POLITICAL PARTIESen
dc.subjectPARLIAMENTARY CANDIDATESen
dc.subjectPLAID CYMRUen
dc.subjectSOCIAL POLICYen
dc.subjectPOLITICAL ISSUESen
dc.subjectPOLITICAL LEADERSen
dc.subjectPOLITICAL MANIFESTOSen
dc.subjectPOLITICIANSen
dc.subjectPUBLIC OPINION POLLSen
dc.subjectSCOTTISH NATIONAL PARTYen
dc.subjectLIBERAL DEMOCRATS (GREAT BRITAIN)en
dc.subjectTACTICAL VOTINGen
dc.subjectVOTINGen
dc.subject2017-2018en
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen
dc.titleMedia Context and the 2017 General Election: How Traditional and Social Media Shape Electionsen
dc.typeDataseten
dc.coverageUnited Kingdomen
Appears in Collections:Cessda

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.