1. By-Covid
  2. All content
  3. Cessda
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://t2-4.bsc.es/jspui/handle/123456789/62962
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorLister, M., Oxford Brookes University, Centre for Global Politics, Economy and Societyen
dc.creatorJarvis, L., Swansea University, Department of Political and Cultural Studiesen
dc.date2012-07-12T10:53:41Zen
dc.identifier10.5255/UKDA-SN-7045-1-
dc.identifier7045-
dc.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7045-1-
dc.identifier.urihttps://t2-4.bsc.es/jspui/handle/123456789/62962*
dc.description<P>Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.</P>en
dc.descriptionThis is a qualitative data collection.<br> <br> The experience of terrorist attacks since 9/11 has led to an increased interest in governmental responses to unconventional political violence. To date however, very little research has been conducted on how ordinary people think about such measures, and particularly the ways in which specific anti-terrorist measures impact on people's perceptions and experiences of safety and security.<br> <br> The project aimed to address this lacuna by conducting focus groups with communities across the United Kingdom, organised around two key segments for analysis: ethnicity and geographical location. In doing so, the aim was to shed light on three important questions: 1. to what extent do significant differences exist in attitudes to anti-terrorism measures based on an individual's geography or ethnicity? 2. What implications do these attitudes - and differences therein - pose for citizenship within the UK? 3. How specifically do 'ordinary' people understand the term 'security' in this particular context, and, indeed, also beyond?<br> <br> Initial findings suggested that whilst differences between ethnic groups in terms of attitudes to anti-terrorism policies (support for them, or otherwise) are slight, that there are more pronounced differences in terms of how such measures have impacted upon individual citizens and communities. Such differences suggest that anti-terrorism measures have differential impacts on different communities and may contribute to a fragmentation of citizenship in the UK. <br> <br>en
dc.description<B>Main Topics</B>:<BR>en
dc.descriptionTopics covered in the focus group interviews include racism, terrorism, media, human rights, foreign policy, anti-terrorism, freedom, security, equality, ethnicity, identity, integration, radicalisation, economic conditions and education.en
dc.languageen-
dc.rightsCopyright M. Lister and L. Jarvisen
dc.subjectTERRORISMen
dc.subjectTERRORIST THREATSen
dc.subjectCOUNTERTERRORISMen
dc.subjectNATIONAL SECURITYen
dc.subjectRESPONSIBILITYen
dc.subjectCOMMUNITIESen
dc.subjectETHNIC GROUPSen
dc.subjectCITIZENSHIPen
dc.subjectRACISMen
dc.subjectISLAMen
dc.subjectHUMAN RIGHTSen
dc.subjectFOREIGN POLICYen
dc.subjectRELIGIONen
dc.subjectMASS MEDIAen
dc.subjectCULTUREen
dc.subjectCRIME AND SECURITYen
dc.subjectNEIGHBOURSen
dc.subjectIMMIGRANTSen
dc.subjectINTEGRATIONen
dc.subjectIDENTITYen
dc.subjectEDUCATIONen
dc.subjectECONOMIC CONDITIONSen
dc.subjectPOLICINGen
dc.subjectRACIAL DISCRIMINATIONen
dc.subjectRADICALISMen
dc.subjectATTITUDESen
dc.subjectGENDERen
dc.subjectPARAMILITARY GROUPSen
dc.subjectSECURITY SERVICESen
dc.subject2010en
dc.subjectEnglanden
dc.subjectWalesen
dc.titleAnti-Terrorism, Citizenship and Security in the United Kingdom, 2010en
dc.typeDataseten
dc.coverageEnglanden
dc.coverageWalesen
Appears in Collections:Cessda

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.